Interpersonal Violence

What we can learn from the 2023 Lunar New Year shootings

Member for

3 months
Subtitle
— Asian American and Pacific Islander communities should be included in future research

What was supposed to be a time of happiness and optimism for a new beginning was ruptured by tragedy and terror. In late January 2023, two horrific mass shootings targeted Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities in Monterey Park and Half Moon Bay, California. The Asian assailants attacked the week of Lunar New Year, one of the most important holidays celebrated in many Asian cultures. Over a year later, these communities and other AAPI communities across the U.S. are still grappling with the devastating aftermath.

These shootings are only two instances of high-profile violence against AAPI communities within the past few years. In March 2021, a gunman shot and killed eight peopleat a spa in Atlanta, Georgia, six of whom were Asian women. In May 2022, another gunman opened fire and shot six people at a Taiwanese church in Irvine, California. In addition, misleading narratives from politicians during the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a drastic uptick in physical and verbal attacks against the AAPI community.

With a growing threat to the AAPI community, it's essential to include this group in future violence research and address the cultural stigma that may be contributing to the issue. 

Violence Research on AAPI

While gun violence against AAPI people and communities has become more prominent, there is a lack of research that focuses on or is inclusive of the AAPI demographic. Much of the research on interpersonal gun violence in the U.S. focuses on Black Americans, and understandably so: the systematic oppression of this racial group has caused them to front the burden of firearm homicide in this country. However, there is significant room for AAPI communities in conversations about violence prevention and opportunities to grow the literature on the causes and effects of violence that are particular to their communities.

The need for gun violence research that is inclusive of AAPI demographics is especially important due to recent increases in gun ownership among AAPI individuals. The increase appears to have been catalyzed by pandemic-era racism and violence fueled by anti-AAPI sentiment. Many of the people driving this increase are first-time gun owners who may not have enough education nor experience with firearm safety and secure storage practices. This is concerning given that the presence of a gun in the household is associated with an increased risk of suicide and homicide among household members. Safe storage practices serve as protective factors.

The increasing number of guns in AAPI communities is made even more concerning when coupled with the existing gap in mental healthcare practice and accessibility.

Cultural Stigma Surrounding Mental Health and Other Risk Factors

In the Monterey Park and Half Moon Bay shootings, there appears to have been several underlying issues that are deeply rooted in culture. The assailants were Asian immigrants, both over the age of 65. The shooter in Monterey Park was said to be somewhat of a loner who spent nights mostly by himself; both shooters had an alleged history of violence.

Research published in 2022 found that Asian American elders experience lower life satisfaction and less emotional support than their peers of other races. Yet, among those with mental illness, Asian people are less likely to utilize mental health services compared to other racial and ethnic groups. This is often due to cultural beliefs, shame, and embarrassment. While rates of mental illness are lower among Asian people than white people, this may be a factor of underdiagnosis and underreporting.

Older adult AAPI immigrants who have stronger cultural ties to their country of origin, limited English proficiency, and trauma from leaving war-torn countries and facing persecution in the U.S. as immigrant minorities may have an increased risk of mental illness. Both Lunar New Year shootings highlight the dangers of stigmatizing mental health within AAPI communities and the need for more research focusing on how to protect against these risk factors.

Progress for AAPI Representation

There is much to be concerned about regarding the increase of violence among AAPI and the lack of research into this issue. However, progress is being made. The 2nd annual AAPI Against Gun Violence convening was held in Washington D.C. in June 2023 and brought together advocates across many organizations to galvanize the gun violence prevention movement within the AAPI community. Recent research focused on AAPI and firearms -- published within the last 2 years -- provides a promising foundation for further study and developing effective interventions. There are also resources for gun owners to learn about safer storage. The fight against stigma and in support of improved mental healthcare access within AAPI communities continues.

It's on each of us to shine a light on the issues impacting forgotten populations. Whether you're including AAPI data in your next analysis, sharing information about safer firearm storage, or lessening the power of stigma by talking about mental health and illness, these necessary changes add up. Together, we can piece back the optimism that was shattered during the 2023 Lunar New Year, and work towards a safer future. 

Originally published in MedPage Today

Domestic violence involving firearms increased during COVID-19 pandemic

Urban area
Quick Summary
Study of five major U.S. cities shows variation in domestic violence trends

To determine the trends in domestic violence and firearm domestic violence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, the researchers used police-reported crime data from Jan. 1, 2018 through Dec. 31, 2020. The onset of the pandemic was considered to be Mar. 20, 2020. The cities examined were Chicago, IL; Cincinnati, OH; Kansas City, MO; Los Angeles, CA; and Nashville, TN. 

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News 

Secondary Categories

Estimated 6.5 million Californians know someone at risk of harming themselves, others

Crime scene at beach
Quick Summary
Study highlights opportunities for people to prevent violence within their social networks

One in five adults in California, or an estimated 6.5 million people, are concerned that someone they know, usually a friend or family member, is at risk of harming themselves or others, according to new research published in Preventive Medicine.

Of the people perceived to be at risk for harming others, an estimated 19% were said to have access to firearms. For those perceived to be at risk of harming themselves, that number was approximately 11%.

The survey showed that 85% of the survey respondents who knew someone at perceived risk of harming themselves took one or more actions to reduce the risk of the person hurting themselves. Actions included talking with the person about the risk, providing resources, and asking family, friends or a mental health professional for help.

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News 

Secondary Categories

Unemployment associated with increase in violence early in COVID-19 pandemic

A store is closed due to COVID-19
Quick Summary
Study of 16 U.S. cities shows historic level of job losses associated with an increase in firearm violence and homicide

The rise in unemployment during the five months of the pandemic was associated with an increase in firearm violence and homicide in 16 American cities. 

“Economic disadvantage and income inequality have long been associated with increased risk of violence,” said Julia Schleimer, the lead author of the study and a research data analyst at VPRP. “Our results indicate that the acute worsening of economic conditions, as we saw at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, may also increase violence risk.” 

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News

New research shows violence is broadly felt by millions of Californians

Candles burning

Research led by UC Davis Professor Garen Wintemute shows that violence indirectly impacts most Californians. Though relatively few may experience or witness a violent act, a large majority of surveyed Californians reported having an “experience of violence” (EV). These included hearing gunshots in their neighborhood, encountering a sidewalk memorial to a violent death or learning about a violent event through their social network.

“If we ask broadly about the experience of violence, rather than focusing on acute events, we find that two-thirds of Californians have a direct personal stake,” said Wintemute, who directs the UC Davis Health Violence Prevention Research Program and is an emergency department physician. “Our main conclusion is that almost everybody is touched by this, and we're a state with relatively low rates of firearm violence. I would expect the situation would be worse in many other states.”

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News

Violence increased most in marginalized neighborhoods early in the COVID-19 pandemic

A crime scene
Quick Summary
New UC Davis study tracks firearm violence, assault and homicide in 13 major U.S. cities by zip code

During the first five months of the pandemic in 2020, low-income communities of color experienced significantly greater increases in firearm violence, homicides and assaults compared to more affluent, white neighborhoods.

Previous studies showed increases in violence in U.S. cities during the pandemic but did not indicate where violence was highest or increased most within those cities.

“We found that zip codes with higher concentrations of low-income Black people and people of color experienced substantially higher rates of violence from March to July 2020 than did zip codes with higher concentrations of high-income white people,” said Julia Schleimer, the lead author of the study and a research data analyst at VPRP.

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News

Secondary Categories

Exposure to violence takes a toll on the socioemotional well-being of Californians

Quick Summary
Survey finds exposure to violence is severely distressing, especially when firearms are involved

Researchers at the UC Davis Violence Prevention Research Program (VPRP) assessed the prevalence of exposure to violence, such as robbery or assault, and its impacts on the mental health and social functioning of California adults. Their study, published in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, shows the far-reaching psychological effects an incident of gun violence can have on victims and those close to them. The study’s findings are based on data from 2,558 adults who responded to the 2018 California Safety and Wellbeing Survey (CSaWS).

“Our study highlights the pervasive socioemotional impacts of violence exposure,” said Amanda Aubel, first author on the study and a research data analyst at VPRP. “It points to the urgent need to address not only the physical but also the psychological consequences of violence exposure and the unique, exacerbating influence of firearms.”

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News

Handgun purchasers with a prior DUI have a greater risk for serious violence, study finds

Legal purchasers of handguns with a prior DUI conviction have a greater risk of a future arrest for a violent offense -- including murder, rape, robbery, and aggravated assault and for firearm-related violent crimes.

“Alcohol use is a well-established risk factor for firearm violence,” said Rose Kagawa, assistant professor of emergency medicine and first author of the VPRP study. “Our study suggests that handgun purchasers with a DUI conviction on their record at the time of purchase have a higher incidence of future violence and crime compared to purchasers without DUI convictions.”

Media Resources

Read the article in UC Davis Health News

Secondary Categories